MAE126B Senior Environmental Engineering Design Project Course Organization
Slides with course description
MAE126B Projects
Project E1: LOTUS River Filtration
Project Advisor: Jan Kleissl
Project members: preassigned to Nathan Cusson, Carina Cornejo,
Samuel Gutierrez, Rohan Kurse
Project E2: Optimizing Carbon Footprint of New UCSD Graduate Housing
Project Advisor: Victoria Gisladottir, victoriagisla
Project members: Itzel Gomez, Maria Fonseca, Jonathan Kingsley,
Lucila Tafur, Milan Das
Project E3: Simulate Solar Powered Microgrid at Plant Grower
Project Advisor: Jan Kleissl
Project members: Valerie Chan, Noe Tsuji, Sam Bunarjo, Ryan Erickson, Rose Kosec
Project E4: Hone in on the Noise - Noise Assessment and Prosection in Dense Urban Environments
Project Advisor: Jan Kleissl
Project members: open for signup
Project E5: San Dieguito River Culvert Survey/Recommendation
Project Advisor: Leana Bulay, San Dieguito River Park
Project members: Dana Thibodeau, Dylan Gerard, Sam Ozenbaugh, Jackie First
Project E6: Runoff Remediation Pond Assessment
Project Advisor: Leana Bulay, San Dieguito River Park
Project members: preassigned to Deborah Gardner, Maria Winters, Alexandrea Hill, Carolina (Irma) Govea, Heather Hardenberg
Project E7: Lagoon Dredging Dump Site Remediation
Project Advisor: Leana Bulay, San Dieguito River Park
Project members: Stephen Messur, Travis Knight, and Youmi Pang.
Project E8: Automated Industrial Waste Water Quality Testing
Project Advisor: Jack Monger, Executive Director, Industrial Environmental Association, Jack.Monger@iea-sd.com
Project members: preassigned to Juan Covarrubias, Chad Nishida, Su Cheong, Kento Hayworth, Tom Sun
Project E9: Cooling Tower Efficiency with Recyled Water
Project Advisor: Jeff Eisert UCSD Environment, Health, and Safety (EH&S) Recycled Water Program Manager, jeisert@ucsd.edu
Project members: Andrew Young, Umay Akkoseoglu, Diego Munoz Iglesias, David Zimmerman, and Emily Srna
Project E10: Surface Powered Energy
Project Advisor: Jan Kleissl
Project members: Preassigned to Thomas Elliott, Adam Zeman, Isabel D'Elia, Victoria Oldham
Project E11: Household Energy Testing Lab
Project Advisor: Jan Kleissl
Project members: Nicholas Walsh, Kevin Perozo, Brandon Schwendeman
Project E12: Unsorted Waste to Energy Conversion
Project Advisor: Mark Anderson, PE, RETECH Engineering, Inc., manderson@retecheng.com,
Project members: Catherine Woo, Brandon Nguyen, George Sarkis, Christina Youkhana, and Siddarth Almeida
Project E13: Low-Cost Power Boosting System for Solar Panels
Project Advisor: Mark Anderson, PE, RETECH Engineering, Inc., manderson@retecheng.com,
Project members: Manasa Muralidharan, Da Yeol Kang, Nanxi Ye, Lynnay Consul
Project E14: Solar Power Following for Heat Pump Water Heater
Project Advisor: Jan Kleissl
Project members: Ho, ioi kuan; Zhang, Zibo; Shi, Ruiqi; Tang, Weijun; Li, Xiang
Project E15: Solar Trees - Feast or Famine?
Project Advisor: Jan Kleissl
Project members: Geoffrey Alves, Sarah Douglas, Raul Huang Liu, Tyler McHenry
Project E16: Raceway Pond for Algae Cultivation
Project Advisor: Dominick Mendola
Project members: Preassigned to Justin Huynh, Laura Darken, Erika Moreno, Fredy Garcia. Closed for signup.
Project E17: Solar Panel Power Boosting through Heat Transfer Enhancement
Project Advisor: Jenny Liu, Interface Materials, Inc., jliu@interfacematerials.com
Project members: Giovanni Coronado, Rentian Dong, Connor Dunn, and Josh Hill.
TA: Guang Wang, g3wang@eng.ucsd.edu, will be in SERF136 Mon 5-7pm
Schedule
There are no regular labtimes. Lectures MWF 4-5p in WLH2204.
- Mon 4/3 4-450pm: Team organization and project planning workshop
- Mon 4/10, Wed 4/12: Project plan presentations by groups.
- 4/14 - 4/21: no lecture
- Mon 4/24, Wed 4/26: Engineering professionalism, report writing. Abbreviated MAE126A slides, 126B slides. Ethics. National Society of Professional Engineers Code of Ethics, Ethics in MAE126B
- 4/28: No lecture
- Mon 5/1, Wed 5/3, Fri 5/5: Midterm presentations by groups
- Mon 5/8, 5pm: Midterm report due by email to course advisor jkleissl@ucsd.edu (all groups).
- Wed 5/10: Preliminary review of team mates due online.
- Mon 5/15: Draft final report provided to reviewing team.
- Mon 5/22: Report peer review due online.
- Sun 6/11 12 noon: Posters due. I will print.
- Wed 6/14 1130am: Final report due.
- Thu 6/15: EBU2 339: 1130am-230pm: Final poster presentation together with MAE156B. Invite family and friends.
- Fri 6/16: Final review of team mates due online.
Resources for Background / Literature Research
Grade Summary
- Midterm Presentation: 10%
- Midterm Report: 20%
- Report Peer Review: 5%
- Final Poster: 25%
- Final Report: 40%
- Peer review will be used to adjust grades individually.
Lab Space, MAE Staff Support:
- MAE126B groups building hardware can use EBU2 room 339 as storage / workspace (request access through Nick Busan, nbusan @ eng.ucsd.edu). Mark your work or storage space with a sign.
- Space in EBU 2 room 339 for assembly and storage of their project (Nick Busan and Chris Cassidy for door code access)
- EBU 2 room 315 Design Studio, Chris Cassidy, for handheld power tools, epoxy station, 3D printing
- EBU 2 room 321 Steve Roberts, for training and solder stations, sensor mentoring and electronics.
- EBU 2 room B30, Tom Chalfant, machining help, bandsaw, hand power tools. Large outside assembly area.
How to prepare for weekly meetings
- Consider the weekly meeting as a progress report delivered by a team from a subcontractor to a project leader. You should demonstrate that you made progress, present your accomplishments concisely and clearly, and ask questions that need to be answered to move forward.
- Come prepared to present your accomplishments. Your design, web research, data analysis, graphs is worth more than 1000 words. Either print it out or send me an email with relevant documents / weblinks before the meeting which i can display on my external monitor so that everybody can see them.
Meeting Times Prof. Kleissl
(weekly in EBU2 580, unless otherwise arranged)
Email several time slots for me to choose from, not just a single time.
Time | Monday | Wednesday | Friday |
1000-1020 | E5 | busy | avlb |
1020-1040 | avlb | busy | avlb |
1040-1100 | avlb | busy | avlb |
1100-1120 | avlb | busy | busy |
1120-1140 | avlb | busy | busy |
1140-1200 | avlb | busy | busy |
1200-1220 | avlb | avlb | busy |
1220-1240 | avlb | avlb | busy |
1240-100 | avlb | avlb | busy |
100-120 | E17 | E15 | busy |
120-140 | E12 | E14 | avlb |
140-200 | avlb | avlb | avlb |
200-220 | E13 | avlb | avlb |
220-240 | avlb | avlb | avlb |
240-300 | avlb | avlb | avlb |
300-320 | avlb | E7 | avlb |
320-340 | avlb | E2 | avlb |
340-400 | E8 | E3 | avlb |
400-420 | lecture | avlb | avlb |
420-440 | lecture | E16 | avlb |
440-500 | lecture | E10 | avlb |
500-520 | avlb | E6 | avlb |
520-540 | avlb | E1 | busy |
540-600 | avlb | E9 | busy |
600-620 | avlb | E11 | busy |
620-640 | avlb | avlb | busy |
Midterm
- Grading sheet used by course instructors for presentation (10% of grade) and report (20% of grade). Try to follow the order of the sections in your presentation / report, but if a different order would result in a better structure / less duplication that is fine.
- Presentations take place as listed in the schedule above during class. Please submit report as editable (MS Word, Google Doc or similar) document via email (no hardcopy) by May 8, 5pm to jkleissl@eng.ucsd.edu. .
- Example of excellent midterm presentation: 8 minute maximum. Provide project definition, description of project tasks & background research, experimental/design methods, work schedule, and progress to date. Speak freely and clearly, don't read off the projection screen, seek eye contact with the audience.
- Report should contain the same material as the presentation but include more details. Some hints:
- List of figures/tables not required.
- A short and clear report is better than a long, confused, and repetitive report. The report should be at most 3,000 words + title page + table of contents + references.
- A good structure with subheadings is important. Number each section and subsection.
- The methods section should describe the experimental / design approach for the entire quarter. How are you going to analyze the data? How are you going to evaluate the performance of the design? etc
- Avoid bulleted lists. A report should consist of free flowing text. Use tables instead of bulleted lists, when necessary (in that case tables require captions and should be referred to in the text).
- Figures and tables need captions. Captions should be detailed enough to understand the figure without consulting the text. All figures and tables have to be referred to in the text.
- Proofread report for language and correct references to figures. A report full of small errors is hard to read and makes a bad impression.
- Use large fonts for text in figures (e.g. axis labels). In matlab use "set(0,'defaultaxesfontsize',13);" at the beginning of every m file to change the default font size used in figures.
Report Peer Review
One or more students from each team will review and provide recommendations for another team's project report. This type of peer review is an important part of learning for both sides: (i) the reviewer learns how to provide good feedback and demonstrate leadership (ii) the reviewed must present their project clearly and concisely and may receive valuable feedback to explore a different direction and/or improve their report. The steps are:
- Send the report to / share the report with the team one number ahead of yours, e.g. E3 sends to E4. The last team should send their report to team E1. If you do not know any of the team members, send the report to your course advisor, who will forward.
- Edit the report document directly, e.g. using track changes in MS Word or comments in Google Docs. Provide the edited document to the course advisor and the team.
- In addition to the detailed comments in the report, provide a higher level summary on how each section meets the report objectives electronic component of the review. Here is a pdf version. Each team should submit one form.
In your review follow the report guidelines and use your engineering knowledge to judge the technical content. Emphasis should be on clarity! If you cannot understand what was done, let the team know! The grade for the report review is based on thoroughness (25%), quality of comments (50%), and creativity (25%).
Team Peer Review
Peer review follows the format of MAE3 and can be submitted here both for midterm and final peer review. Login to your individual peer review form using:
- Lower case UCSD email address (e.g. jkleissl@ucsd.edu)
- PID number with upper case A (e.g. A00000002)
Your peer review can only be submitted once, so be prepared to complete the form in one sitting. Completing the peer review on time is a required component of the course.
The peer reviews will be kept anonymous from other students in the class, but the averaged results and combined comments from your teammates will be emailed to the students being reviewed. This email will be sent only after all team members have submitted their form.
It is not proper etiquette to ask your teammates how they reviewed you.
If you choose to add comments in “Areas for Improvement” then comments should also be entered under “Helpful Actions.” Effective feedback focuses on the impact of certain actions rather than on a team member’s personality.
A combined rating is provided, where the average score for each student is 1000 points, which reflects the overall contribution of the team member being reviewed. If you enter a combined score of 900 or lower, then comments must be entered to justify this scoring, either to the instructor or in the student feedback area.
The intermediate peer reviews are for feedback purposes and the results do not affect the course grade, but the final peer reviews can have a large impact on ones grade!
Final
- Final presentation will be a poster session for MAE126B students Thu June 15 1130-230pm in EBU2 339. Grade sheet. Send poster to jkleissl@ucsd.edu by Sun June 11 12 noon to allow time for final revisions and printing. We will use this printer http://acms.ucsd.edu/info/cplot.shtml, so the power point should be 30 high x 42 inches wide. Sample Poster. The 'presentation' will be a 3-5 minute overview of the poster delivered to the course advisor some time during the poster session.
- Reports due June 14 at 1130am by email (no hardcopy). Report Grade sheet. Report specs: 8,000 words max (counting everything except for references, table of content; list of figures/tables not required)
- Example of excellent report with my comments in red.
- The final grade will consist of:
- 40% of grade: max 14 page Report as electronic copy in native (e.g. MS Word, Openoffice etc) AND pdf format. Suggested contents and range of weights:
- Title, abstract, and table of contents (1%). List of figures, tables not required.
- 1. Introduction: project definition, background including literature survey and basic theory (4%)
- 2. Methods: Theory, Experimental, and/or Design Method (7-12%) [What does one need to know to understand the project? How and what data was collected?]
- 3. Results
- 3.1. Results of design / experiment (9-14%)
- 3.2. Errors and limitation (4%)
- 4. Discussion and Conclusions. Future Work / Recommendations (8%)
- 5. References (1%)
- Overall presentation is graded as follows: Presentation and clarity of figures and tables, style and language, length
Budget
US$ 150 / group from MAE department. These funds can only be used for project-related expenses (usually parts) and have to be cleared by me. Index numbers are E1--AMEUE01, E2--AMEUE02, E3--AMEUE03, E4--AMEUE04, E5--AMEUE05, E6--AMEUE06, E7--AMEUE07, E8--AMEUE08, E9--AMEUE09, E10--AMEUE10, E11--AMEUE11, E12--AMEUE12, E13--AMEUE13, E14--AMEUE14, E15--AMEUE15, E16--AMEUE16, E17--AMEUE17. Reimbursement form
Additional funds can be disbursed by the project advisor and do not have to be cleared by me.